2 min read
24 Mar 2026
Many business owners sign what they think is a standard commercial lease, only to later discover that the Retail Leases Act 2003 (VIC) (RLA) applies. This discovery often occurs in the middle of a dispute, and can have a major impact on the rights and obligations of both landlords and tenants. This is why, understanding whether your lease is legally considered as a retail lease becomes crucial.
Misclassifying a lease can:
A common misconception is that the application of the RLA can be contracted out or determined by election or agreement. No, the RLA applies by force of statute and whether a lease is ‘retail’ depends on the statutory definition and the factual use of the premises, not the title or label on the document.
This article covers when the RLA applies, key exemptions, and the practice implications for landlords and tenants at the entry, renewal and dispute stages. It also a reminder of why consulting a property lawyer early can help avoid costly mistakes.
The RLA regulates leases of ‘retail premises’ in Victoria. The main purpose of this Act is to promote fairness and transparency in retail leasing relationships, and to provide a standardised and structured framework for resolving disputes and regulate risk.
It governs matters such as:
If the RLA applies, it materially alters the commercial risk profile of the lease between the landlord and the tenant.
Under Section 4(1) of the RLA, premises are considered ‘retail premises’ if they are used or are to be used, wholly or predominantly for:
A lease will generally be considered a retail lease where the permitted use and actual use of the premises involve supplying goods or services directly to end users.
Courts and VCAT often examine substance over drafting and labels, and consider (among other things):
The practical takeaway is that industrial appearance, business-to-business services or ‘commercial’ drafting would not reliably prevent the RLA from applying if, in substance, the use is retail.
The 2020 amendments to the RLA have clarifiedaspects of the RLA, reinforcing disclosure requirements and refining certain obligations relating to landlords and tenants. This means lease and disclosure templates prepared prior to those amendments require updating as they remain a recurring source of dispute. However, the core definition of ‘retail premises’ was not altered.
Not all leases fall within the ambit of RLA. Common exclusions include:
Whether an exemption applies depends on the specific facts and lease structure. A lease starts as a retail premises lease cannot cease to be one during its term, however, its status may need to be reassessed upon renewal.
It is common to see clauses where the tenant ‘acknowledges’ that the RLA does not apply. However, section 94 of the RLA general prevents parties from contracting out the RLA, as seen applied in Access Solutions International Pty Ltd v Gamet Pty Ltd [2017] VCC 1563, where such clause carried little weight once the factual use met the statutory definition.
As mentioned above, drafting the permitted use to exclude ‘retail’ is also unreliable. In Koga Nominees Pty Ltd v Locsam Australia Pty Ltd & Ors [2018] VSC 455, the Victorian Supreme Court indicated that excluding retail use in the lease was not decisive. Then, in Bulk Powders Pty Ltd v Seicon Pty Ltd (Building and Property) [2018] VCAT 2000, VCAT placed weight on the fact that the premises were not open to the public and were mainly used for production and storage, despite online sales to consumers.
Having a retail lease under the RLA can unlock statutory protections including in relation to:
For landlords, mis-categorising a lease can lead to disputes, unrecoverable charges and forensic scrutiny of standard documents. Non-compliance with the RLA can affect:
Where market rent is disputed under a retail lease, the RLA provides for the appoint of a specialist retail valuer. Such valuers are required to assess current market rent in accordance with criteria set out in the legislation and any applicable regulations.
For both the landlord and the tenant, involving a specialist retail valuer early can reduce the scope of the dispute and avoid prolonged arguments over methodology and comparables.
Determining if the RLA applies to your commercial lease requires careful legal and factual analysis – it is rarely a ‘tick-box’ exercise. Experienced leasing lawyers at PCL Lawyers regularly assist landlords and tenants in reviewing and drafting retail and commercial leases and advise on compliance and lease disputes.
If you are entering into, renewing or disputing a lease and you are unsure whether the RLA applies, it is prudent to obtain advice before you sign or take your next step. Early advice can prevent costly mistakes and help you structure a lease that reflects the real risk and cost allocation you intend.
Disclaimer: This article has been prepared for general information purposes and may not apply to your situation. This information should not be relied upon for legal, tax or accounting advice. Your individual circumstances will alter any legal advice given. The views expressed may not reflect the opinions, views or values of PCL Lawyers and belong solely to the author of the content. © PCL Lawyers Pty Ltd.
If you require legal advice specific to your situation please speak to one of our team members today.
Justin Leong is a senior property and commercial lawyer advising on complex, high-value real estate transactions and leasing matters across NSW and other Australian jurisdictions. He advises...
You want to know that you are getting advice and real solutions. You not only want a lawyer who has strong experience and knowledge in legal matters, but a lawyer who can also navigate you through the commercial realities.
Request a meeting
"*" indicates required fields